NEWS FLASH: Leggings aren’t pants! They may be called “pants” by many, but do not be fooled: in reality, they are opaque-at-best tights with the feet cut off.
It is irritating (on a good day) and appalling (on a bad day) to me that leggings are passed off as pants, and are employed as an excuse to don otherwise unacceptably short “dresses” which are actually just long shirts. Tell me this: if you weren’t wearing those “pants” (aka leggings) underneath, would you be wearing that short of a top? For many of the people I know (especially those who are endowed or claim to adhere to the LDS modesty standards), I think not.
And just so you know, when you bend over, they’re not opaque any more. Yeah, that’s right; I just saw your underwear. Not something I was hoping to experience today.
Seeing what every little detail of your leg and thigh looks like in HD is a privilege that I will gladly reserve for your husband. Honestly, most people don’t want to see that much of you, and those who do, aren’t worth it. Keep it to yourself.
BA HA HA HA HA HA- Dani, you rock. You just put into words every feeling I've ever felt about leggings. I decided I HATED them the day I had the misfortune to witness a woman in her 40's wearing only white leggings as pants at the post office..... ugh.... still makes me shudder.
ReplyDelete